5 Tips to Get Your First Journal Paper Published

If you are publishing your journal work for the first time, it might seem quite an intimidating process. However you can find many tips, and help from professional experts who have experienced this before. You can publish your first best journal inengineering paper and get online patent feedback and also get an enjoyable experience. You will feel much more confident about writing and submitting your papers. Through this tips you can get to know publishing your first journal paper.

1.      Find the Right Journal before You Start

This is the most crucial step and might bring a chance of receiving a rejection. However, if you publish your paper in the right circle, this will cite can be used. The reviewers whom you allocate your journal of engineering technology papers are much likely to publish them in specific areas and can give you feedback to improve your paper that will be a receptive to your findings and research work. So, now you have to know if a journal of applied sciences is right or not for you. You can do this by going through the first 10 publications in your specific area and see if there journal that is most commonly published. After you have found the top ones, see if those journals publish the type of research you present. Also check the journal citation report and impact factor on web science. In this way you can narrow down your list to 1 to 2 journals. If you’re still not sure, you can mail the journal editor with a brief description of your journal and ask them if they can consider such a paper to publish.

2.      Revise and Resubmit or Major Revision

When you receive a revise and resubmit decision, don’t panic because this is good news and it means to negotiate with the journal editor. If it is your first paper, it is uncommon to get minor revisions on a submitted UGCApproved Journal, which has not been reviewed before. If the email you receive is in your inbox for 1 to 2 days, you can give room to breathe and deal less emotion and more objectively.

3.      Addresses and Respond to all of the Reviewers Concern

The first thing to do is to read through it all and sort out every comment you have received methodologically. This will be easy for you to address the reviewers concern and then change them as per suggestion. You can use strategy as mentioned and place the comments over a spreadsheet with columns like reviewers comment. Presenting them in this way mean that you could correct them that are easy to do and see which concerns had been repeated by reviewers. This format is easy for your supervisor and can be approved and you can see how reviewers comment had been addressed. However, you have to respond to all comments in trivial.

4.      Use Appropriate Language to Address the Reviewers Concern

You should be more courteous and polite in your response to each of the concerns mentioned by the reviewers. This will be favourable to the reviewers and editors. Some comments may make you angry or swear, but it is important not to put those across the comment. Therefore, it is wise to edit the response in template with light hand and make changes that seem good in the sight of reviewers or editor.

5.      Do not take Feedback or Rejection Personally

This underpins some of the frustration many researchers have with whole publishing procedure. When you receive a very long list of corrections, may be 40-50 comments, it feels easy to be deflated and start doubting their research skills. But is naturally truth and seen many experiences researchers have found that long list of comments/corrections. So, it’s advisable not to take them personally since changes, amendments, corrections, criticism and feedback will only improve your paper and help you get it published.